EXCLUSIVE: New Delhi Does Not Support Attempts to Isolate Russia, Says Russian Ambassador to India_我的网站
A | Sputnik: How do you assess the results of the XIV BRICS Summit for Russia and India?,Denis Alipov: The XIV BRICS Summit held on 23 June this year was certainly another significant step in the development of the BRICS [Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa] grouping, which in essence reflects the formation of a new reality in international relations - the transition from a unipolar system to a polycentric world order.,The important thing is that, against the backdrop of geopolitical collisions, the five countries send a powerful message of common understanding of global processes - from reforming the multilateral system of economic governance to the situation in disarmament and non-proliferation, information security, counter-terrorism and other challenges. There was a clear consensus against arbitrary sanctions, which are the exclusive prerogative of the UN Security Council. We also shared a disapproval of the distorting effects of any discriminatory measures in international trade, which mainly affect developing countries.,Of course, our main target now is to build a smooth and reliable system of mutual settlements as an alternative to a compromised mechanism based on the dominance of the US dollar. We suggest developing a new international currency, to connect the banks of the BRICS countries to the Russian System for Transfer of Financial Messages, SPFS (a SWIFT analogue), to integrate national payment systems into a unified network for cross-border clearing settlements.,Clearly, no less importantly are steps to strengthen BRICS’ sectoral cooperation, which, according to the results of this year's work, continues to expand in the spheres of health, science and technology, space, etc. The New Development Bank, having a loan portfolio of $29Bln, stands out for its successful project activities.,The BRICS+ High-level Forum on Sustainable Development received a great response, which demonstrated the considerable interest developing countries have in cooperating with BRICS, and the positive global agenda that the grouping is building.,I believe that the BRICS, contrary to criticism, will have an increasing influence on world processes.,Sputnik: How does India and China's interaction within the BRICS framework unfold against the backdrop of the territorial dispute between the two countries in Ladakh? And how does this disagreement generally affect how the 'Five' interact and work with each other? Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Wednesday said that “common interests of India and China 'far outweigh' the differences” at a meeting with India’s ambassador to Beijing - is that really true?,Denis Alipov: Interaction within BRICS is mature and constructive. The active participation of India and China in all BRICS events this year clearly demonstrates this. The most important thing is that the member states use this platform not to antagonize each other but to promote mutually beneficial cooperation and synergy of interests.,The "Five" offer an extensive common agenda on these very foundations, that in one way or other will also contribute to overcoming bilateral disagreements.,Sputnik: Does BRICS plan to expand in the near future (according to media reports, China is in favor of this), and how do Russia and India view this?,Denis Alipov: The interest of like-minded countries in the "Five" is proof positive of how inclusive the association is, its openness to cooperation with all constructively minded partners, ready to seek answers to the challenges which are facing the international community at present.,Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stressed that the discussion of BRICS expansion is justified and timely. The idea itself received principled support at the XIV BRICS Summit. Another thing to remember is that haste in this matter may be counterproductive. It is necessary to think in detail about the principles, standards and procedures of such a process, which should be developed through debate and by consensus. The main thing is that the accession of new members will help to increase the effectiveness and practical impact of the “Five's” activities.,Sputnik: How do you assess BRICS' role as a platform for building relations between the members of the association and enhancing relations between Russia and India in particular?,Denis Alipov: BRICS plays an important role in building relations between member countries. It has a great deal of institutional capacity and experience in practical cooperation. As I have already said, the “Five” share a common understanding of the need to build an equitable and fair polycentric model of the global system that corresponds with the political, economic and cultural diversity of today's world and meets the interests of all its states.,The decisions made at this platform undoubtedly also contribute to enhancing cooperation between India and Russia. It is sufficient to cite a few examples of the mechanisms that have been created: the New Development Bank, the Vaccine Research and Development Center, and the Joint Committee on Space Cooperation. Each of them provides a platform for experts to share experiences and find promising solutions in specific areas, and they can use this useful experience both at home and with regard to the interaction between our two countries.,BRICS May Defuse Frozen Border Issues Between India and China, Expert Says27 June, 10:14 GMT,Sputnik: India has recently come under pressure from the West because of its balanced stance on Russia's special military operation in Ukraine. Have the anti-Russian sanctions affected the cooperation between Moscow and New Delhi? And have you personally noticed any changes in the Indian position?,Denis Alipov: The partnership between Russia and India rests on a deep strategic foundation, drawing its strengths not only from strong historical roots, but also on a coinciding vision of the future world order. As you see, the external conjunction is incapable of affecting our relations in any meaningful way. We have regularly seen evidence of this in statements by the Indian leadership in recent months.,We are grateful to New Delhi for its objective assessment of the Ukrainian events. Clearly, they understand the background of the present geopolitical and geo-economic situation and the forced nature of Russia's actions in Ukraine. They see the destructive role of illegitimate restrictions in the genesis of the present global food and energy crisis, the responsibility for which the West seeks to place entirely on our country.,India does not support attempts to isolate Russia in multilateral forums and is critical of the West's wish to reduce the international agenda to the conflict in question, ignoring other key global and regional problems, which the West itself has exacerbated significantly. The pressure exerted by the West, aggressively imposing its conditions about who one can and cannot be friends with, causes the rejection of such diktat.,At the same time, we must be realistic about what is happening: India is interested in developing cooperation with the rest of the world, including the United States and Europe. National interests and the need to preserve strategic autonomy guide the Indians in their actions, rejecting the very idea of dividing lines and the paradigm of bloc confrontation.,As for the sanctions as such, they certainly throw up challenges, which will require a certain time to adapt and, I am sure, will be overcome in time. The main thing is that our cooperation actively continues because it is based on common interests and an understanding of each other's special place in mutual strategic arrangements.,Sputnik: In December 2021, Russia and India outlined many new goals for cooperation, including doubling mutual trade and investment. How realistic do these goals now seem?,Denis Alipov: First and foremost, it should be noted that the goals outlined in December 2021 at the annual bilateral summit in New Delhi are fully consistent with the enormous potential of our relations. The India-Russia partnership operates on all sorts of levels. We are expanding cooperation in communications, diamond processing, forestry, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, tourism, railroads, metallurgy, civil aviation, shipbuilding and oil refining. Our military and military-technical cooperation is being strengthened. We are progressively implementing the plans adopted at the 2019 Vladivostok Summit to work together in the Far Eastern and Arctic regions, and we are building up cooperation in the trade, economic, investment, banking and financial sectors.,The dynamics of bilateral trade speak for itself. According to India's statistics, from January to April 2022, it amounted to $6.4Bln. This is almost twice as much as for the same period last year. If we maintain these volumes throughout the year, we will have a turnover of more than $19Bln by the end of 2022. To put this in context, let me remind you that in the previous year we had an absolute record of $13.6Bln.,I expect that despite the West's sanctions against Russia, the positive dynamics of trade will continue. Unfortunately, in the first months after the launch of the special military operation in Ukraine there were certain difficulties with supplying Russian goods to India and vice versa. However, today we have successfully overcome most of these barriers. We are confident that Indian exports to Russia (including science-intensive ones) will gain momentum in the near future.,We see good prospects for Indian pharmaceutical products, leather and textiles, agricultural goods, components for machinery and equipment, telecommunications equipment, organic chemistry products. We expect growth in mutual turnover of services in such sectors as tourism, finance and insurance, telecommunications and information technology, transport and construction. We have great hopes for the implementation of the International North–South Transport Corridor (INSTC) project.,The withdrawal of many western companies from the Russian market opens up many new opportunities for Indian businesses. The Russian business community is very serious about strengthening ties with India. Russia invites Indian companies in the aviation and metallurgical industries, in the wood-processing chain, and firms producing consumer goods for business cooperation.,Our main task today is to adjust our trade and economic relations to the new realities, to synchronize the payment systems of the two countries, giving priority to the increased use of national currencies.,Sputnik: US media giants, despite the diversity of the Indian media sphere, have been successful in infiltrating it. How far do you think has US propaganda penetrated local media? How do you view your interaction with the Indian media against this backdrop?,Denis Alipov: Indeed, western media has taken a very strong hold around the world and in India as well. These circumstances – and many local analysts point this out – limit the ability of national media outlets to offer their audiences an independent view of global processes. Much of the content published here is reprints from Reuters, the Associated Press, and AFP, all of which openly promote the interests of the so-called collective West, not shying away from fostering Russophobic sentiments and trafficking fake news.,India Discussing Rupee-Ruble Payment Mechanism With Russia24 June, 13:35 GMT,This is especially evident in the Indian media's coverage of events around Ukraine. Local newspapers sometimes publish absolute nonsense, exposing a basic ignorance of the region and history. There is no shortage of blatantly ordered articles aimed at denigrating the activities of Russian companies in India. This is nothing but an attempt at unfair competition.,Obviously, we respond appropriately. We publish our own material and rebuttals. We work with the press corps and explain all the nuances of the events from a historical and geopolitical point of view. We make active use of internet resources in this area.,It is noteworthy that local authorities have also intervened in the situation. In April this year, India's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting issued recommendations to satellite TV channels, indicating the unacceptability of spreading inaccurate and misleading information, including in the context of covering Russia's special military operation in Ukraine.,We know that the vast majority of our Indian friends, including in the journalistic community, do not share the one-sided view of the situation imposed on them. They prefer to trust facts, which, incidentally, are in the public domain - every day relevant materials are posted on the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense's websites. They can also be found on the embassy's website and its social media accounts.,Some Indian journalists visited the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, wanting to see with their own eyes what was really going on. Their reports and interviews are now available to the public. I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude for their work.,Furthermore, I would like to thank our audience on social media. Thanks to their comments and support, we can see that attempts to tarnish Russia are doomed to failure.,Sputnik: You are an expert on India and speak Hindi. Please tell us, what made you fall in love with this country?,Denis Alipov: India for me is a life-long journey. I have spent more than 27 years here, studied its history in college, and been directly involved with the development of relations with it throughout my tenure.,As it did for my mentor and predecessor, the late Ambassador Alexander Kadakin [Russia's ambassador to India from 2009 to 2017], India became for me a 'Karmabhoomi' - a land of action.,India is an incredible country, an ancient civilization that combines centuries-old traditions and modern trends, the diversity of cultures, languages and beliefs. It is the brightest embodiment of the formula of unity in diversity. Rapid economic, scientific and technological development, the large young active population, the impressive growth of authority in the global arena have ensured its strong place among the world powers that will determine the future of our planet.。
C | 他看了看演讲稿，抬头扫视四周，深呼吸一口，然后说：“我以非盟联盟的名义，对各国表示致意，希望这次大会成为历史上最具历史意义的大会之一”。事实证明，这次大会真的具有历史意义。他先是痛批联合国的存在没有意义，毫无约束力，尤其是对五常没有约束力，导致五常为非作歹，然后把联合国五常挨个骂了一遍，连祖宗都问候了。最后，他还做出了一个惊人的举动，他拿出一本《联合国宪章》，并当众撕毁，令全场目瞪口呆，这位惊天地泣鬼神的男子，名叫奥马尔·穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲，时任北非国家利比亚的领导人。藐视联合国的行为，很快让卡扎菲付出了惨痛的代价，两年后，“阿拉伯之春”爆发，并蔓延到了利比亚国内。利比亚国内对他不满的人早就不少，于是抗议游行此起彼伏，看到机会来了，法国亲自下场，要求在利比亚设立禁飞区，并把草案提交到了安理会。五常没有一个帮卡扎菲的，以致于他被法国人逼得走投无路，最后在家乡苏尔特被打死。
D | 卡扎菲和五常都有过节，利比亚的石油原先是英美占据的，卡扎菲上台后，实行了石油国有化，把英美给得罪得死死的；卡扎菲和苏联的关系很铁，苏联解体后一开始也不错，但是车臣战争爆发后，不知道他搭错了哪根弦，选择支持车臣叛军，得罪了俄罗斯，后来虽然关系有所修复，但不满的种子是种下了；这样做的目的，是通过台湾要挟中国大陆，迫使我们援助原子弹技术；对于法国，卡扎菲也得罪得不轻。萨科齐当政时期，他把“地中海联盟”作为了重要政绩，其实就是法国想拉个群，找几个小弟，以便把地中海变成自己的内湖。但是卡扎菲带头反对，还游说其他地中海沿岸国家，成为“地中海联盟”搞不成的一大原因，萨科齐恨死卡扎菲了。于是有人说，和五常的过节，才是卡扎菲落得那般下场的根源，其实吧，他和五常有过节不假，但五常并不会因此就联手弄他。因为像卡扎菲这般，同时和五常存在过节的人，比如埃苏丹，他和五常的过节，比起卡扎菲有过之而无不及，但埃苏丹至今都活得好好的，而卡扎菲已经回炉重造了。除了土耳其的地理位置重要外，其实还有别的原因。埃苏丹和卡扎菲的区别就在于，他只想要一点利益，只想在桌子上多吃一点菜，而不是掀桌子，和五常国家的过节，动机就是从利益出发的。要钱而已，好说，能用钱解决的问题，那都不叫问题，因此五常能够容忍。而卡扎菲，是奔着要命去的。
E | 二战后的秩序是“雅尔塔体系”，联合国就是雅尔塔体系的核心，“雅尔塔体系”就是秩序，是一张大桌子，五常和一大票国家都是在这张大桌子上吃饭的。
F | 当众撕毁《联合国宪章》是赤裸裸的掀桌子，自己不吃，别人也别想吃。如果卡扎菲有实力，别人可能还忌惮一点，偏偏他没多少实力，别人一看，你丫没实力也敢这么玩？再想想过往的恩怨，不弄他都不行了。
G | 就像历史上的袁术，没实力也敢称帝，结果就是被群殴。卡扎菲的事情距离我们并不远，不过十几年而已，按理说应该是世界的殷鉴，但很显然，“哀之而不鉴之”是历史的常态，新的卡扎菲，出现了。2024年5月10日上午，以色列常驻联合国代表埃尔丹，在会议厅内，做出了和当年卡扎菲一样的荒唐举动。
H | 他把《联合国宪章》放进一部小型碎纸机内，机器很快将《宪章》切割得粉碎，而这么做的原因，是联合国大会要对巴勒斯坦加入联合国的问题，进行投票。尽管联合国大会的投票只算是决议，决议是没有强制力的，充其量是一种态度的表达而已，但以色列还是愤怒不已，希望通过这种极端的方式，让大家不要投票，或者投反对票。不过很显然，埃尔丹的愤怒起到了反效果，决议最后的结果是143票赞成，9票反对，25票弃权，全世界压倒性赞成巴勒斯坦加入联合国。这次决议的反对票不足两位数，而此前关于巴以问题的决议，反对票通常都在两位数以上。这还只是数量上，质量上差异更明显。以前日本、英国和法国等美国的传统核心盟友，总会有那么几个投反对票，而这次，反对票里除了美国和以色列，其他七张反对票的质量都很差。有四张是太平洋岛国的，分别是瑙鲁、帕劳、密克罗尼西亚和巴布亚新几内亚。另外三张是匈牙利、捷克和阿根廷，美国传统的核心盟友，要么反对要么弃权，比如法国，法国在此前半年时间里，都是站在以色列一边的，现在竟然也转向了，投了赞成票，赞成巴勒斯坦加入联合国。而25张弃权票里，有一张尤为特别，就是乌克兰。
I | 乌克兰正在和俄罗斯交战，十分需要美国的支持，按理说是不敢忤逆美国的，但现在连乌克兰都弃权了，侧面反应了人心的向背。当众粉碎了《联合国宪章》，等于否定联合国的合法性，但问题是，以色列的建国合法性本身就来源于“联合国181号决议”。
K | 大家看在美国的份上，也是可以容忍的。可当埃尔丹当众碎掉《联合国宪章》时，性质就变了。变成了要命，要动摇秩序，要掀桌子。这种行为是极其离谱的，外交官可以用激烈的言辞去反对竞争对手，也可以在具体行为上耍小聪明，这些都是外交行业里常见的现象，无非是为了国家利益和国家形象，大家其实能够理解。而埃尔丹，这个以色列驻联合国代表的表现，是极其不称职的，就算上面有KPI压着他，也不是没有更合理的方式。但他这大半年来的表现，完完全全是一条疯狗，追着各国骂、做出种种怪异行为就算了，现在还来这么一出，对于以色列的国家形象影响完全是负面的。
L | 5月10日是一个分水岭，如果说5月10日前，世界大部分国家对犹太人和以色列还有一丝同情的话，那么在5月10日的投票后，在埃尔丹当众粉碎《联合国宪章》，最后的一丝同情也会消散。在开战之初，以色列不断地向全世界卖惨，这是错误的做法，因为其恶行实在是太明显了，无论如何都已经无法挽回。这时最重要的不是辩经，而是证明自己的实力，坏人就要有坏人的样子。结果全世界都看到了，加沙就这么芝麻大点地方，骑自行车都可以环绕全程，以色列打得极度吃力。这种情况下，以色列就不应该继续藐视国际道德，鼓吹什么弱肉强食了。有句话说的好，强则自由贸易，弱则闭关锁国。强者总是喜欢推崇弱肉强食的自由，弱者则往往希望有保护和兜底，最好有一扇门来保护自己。以色列在中东的定位已经不是一个强者了，继续叫嚣弱肉强食，无视国际秩序和道德，一旦美国真的保不住它了，那么中东其他国家就可以用同样的手法对待它。《圣经》旧约里有这样一段话，“弱者崩溃、被屠杀并被从历史中抹去；而强者，无论好坏，都能生存下来。强者受到尊重，与强者结盟最终与强者和平。”虽然我不相信宗教，但不得不承认有些内容写得有道理。犹太圣经里说，以色列灭国是上帝的意志，犹太人在全世界流浪是符合犹太教义的，换句话说，这就是命。现在，以色列不仅手撕《联合国宪章》，还说在二战期间没有任何国家帮助犹太人，完全否定了中国上海对于犹太人的救助。
M | 堂堂一个国家搞成这样，直接来个唐妞不等式，你救过我不等于我会记住你，请问以后还会有谁愿意收留犹太人，拉他们一把？别说什么美国绝对不可能放弃以色列，这个世界上没什么东西是绝对的。别忘了，盎撒和犹太也是有矛盾的。
N | 当以色列在错误的道路上开启狂奔时，那它唯一的办法就是绑住美国，硬拉着美国和越来越多的国家对抗，同时祭出《反犹太主义意识法》这种令人目瞪口呆的法案。而这样一来，犹太和盎撒的矛盾便会加剧。美国现在的确很护着以色列，不停地为它输送新鲜血液，可随着血条越来越短，美国自身都不够用了，随着时间的推移，早晚有一天，双方需要为有限的血液进行内卷，旧有的关系就会被打破。到那时，恐怕就没人能再庇护以色列和犹太人了。 在我的知识星球，能看到 每日时政深度点评，了解国家大事，看透国际风云变幻财经股评，从宏观视角读懂股市变化本质，掌握市场规律 分享我的观点和见解2019年，从《文在寅的复仇》开始，有几百万读者关注我们，我在文章里带大家解析了当今国际局势和中国的崛起之路。
。
o |
Current article:http://www.suiyangguiduanzudoushaopao.buzz/12t7/z9uu3o.xlsx
